The uptick in numbers for North Dakota can be attributed partly to additional precipitation. "The last two years we have increase beef cow numbers opposite of the U.S." "(The numbers) have gone up the last two years, mainly a result of saving replacement heifers," Petry said. This helped North Dakota jump in rank from the 13th producer of cattle to ninth. Producers expanded the state's inventory to 943,000, the highest since 2005. There was some good news for North Dakota. While ranchers got relief through donations, the state still ended the year with 54,000 less head. 5 producer was hit by a record blizzard in October, killing 60,000 cattle. 10 Iowa gave way to North Dakota by losing 40,000.īut possibly the most devastating loss was South Dakota. 4 Nebraska, a state also impacted by drought, lost 8,000. "There was major, major liquidation that happened a couple of years ago in Texas and Oklahoma particularly," Ellingson said. That is a slight decrease compared to losing 550,000 and 460,000 in the last two years, bring Texas' total three-year loss to more than 1 million cattle.ĭrought played a large part in decision-making for ranchers in the south, said Julie Ellingson, executive vice president of the North Dakota Stockmen's Association. The January numbers show Texas, the county's top producer of cattle, lost 105,000 cattle. Six out of the top 10 beef cow states lost cattle this year. The January numbers were also down 1.8 percent from last year at 87.7 million, the lowest since 1951. Producers saw an upward trend from 2004-06, but then the numbers fell. The cattle inventory for July has been on a downward trend since 1994, when the U.S. The USDA Forest Service manages approximately 193 million acres in 44 states, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.There were no 2013 numbers to compare since the government shutdown affected the USDA. The grazing fee is calculated based on data collected annually by the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistical Service, including the average annual change in beef cattle prices, leasing rates for grazing on private land in the western states, and the costs of livestock production. Grazing fees apply to rangelands managed by the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management in addition to the USDA Forest Service. Under that Executive Order, the grazing fee cannot fall below $1.35 per head month and any change in fees cannot be more than 25% of the previous year’s level. It has continued under a presidential Executive Order in 1986. Permit holders and should contact their local Forest Service office for more information.Ĭongress established the formula used for calculating grazing fees in the 1976 Federal Land Policy and Management Act and as amended in the 1978 Public Rangelands Improvement Act. ![]() The western states fee applies to approximately 6,000 permits administered by the Forest Service in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wyoming and the national grasslands in Texas. ![]() ![]() The grazing fee is calculated by considering the average annual change in beef cattle prices, leasing rates for grazing on private land in the western states, and the costs of livestock production. ![]() The 2022 fee remains unchanged from 2021.Ī head month is a unit the Forest Service uses to define a month’s use of the range by a cow/calf pair, by five goats or sheep, or by a single bull, steer, heifer, horse, burro, or mule. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Forest Service is announcing that western states federal grazing fees will be $1.35 per head month for 2022.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |